![]() ![]() The Debtor was unable to secure replacement counsel and appeared pro se at trial. ![]() Grace's request was granted by this Court's order of August 2, 1989.ģ. Grace, Debtor's counsel, requested permission to withdraw as counsel due to Debtor's inability to pay attorney's fees. After two extensions of time in which to plead, an answer was filed on October 25, 1988. The Complaint objecting to Debtor's discharge was filed on August 22, 1988. On May 5, 1988, she voluntarily converted her Chapter 11 case to a proceeding under Chapter 7.Ģ. Zell ("Debtor") filed a voluntary petition for relief pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 7, 1987. ![]() The following opinion constitutes the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule ("Rule") 7052.ġ. This is a core proceeding arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) and the General Order of Reference entered in this district. ![]() The Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A trial was held on October 25, 1989, after which the matter was taken under advisement. The debtor's entitlement to a discharge in bankruptcy has been challenged by G & J Investments, whose complaint requests denial of debtor's discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Presently under consideration by the Court is an adversary proceeding to determine the debtor's eligibility to receive a discharge in her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. Appleby, Emens, Hurd, Kegler & Ritter, Columbus, Ohio, for G & J Investments, Inc.Ĭharles M. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |